Inferix Decentralized GPU
  • Getting Started
    • Overview
    • $IFX
    • Resources
    • Brand Kit
    • Frequently asked questions (FAQs)
  • Inferix Whitepaper
    • Introduction
      • Rendering network using crowdsourced GPU
      • Rendering verification problem
    • High-level description of ANGV
      • Noise generation
      • Noise verification
      • Thread model
    • Implementation of ANGV
      • Structure of noise
      • Noise insertion
        • Geometric constraints
        • Distortion region
      • Adaptive noise spreading
      • Verification key generation
      • Noise verification
      • Threat analysis
        • Attacks on verification keys
        • Attacks on noises
        • Attacks on verifiers
      • Performance evaluation
      • Integration
    • Decentralized visual computing
      • Client Apps plugin
      • Client API and SDK
      • Manager node
      • Worker node
      • Decentralized storage
        • Data categories
        • Multi-level 3D polygon data
        • Polygon digester
        • Decentralized storage
        • Decentralized cache
      • Data security with FHE and TEE
        • Verifier data security enhancement with FHE
        • Worker and Manager data security enhancement with FHE
    • Decentralized federated AI
      • Federated learning with TensorOpera
      • Meta LLaMA
      • Stable Diffusion
      • Other AI models
      • Inferix AI
    • Economic model
      • GPU compute market for visual computing and federated AI
      • Inferix vision
      • $IFX token
      • Burn-Mint-Work token issuance model
      • Inferix bench and IBME
        • IB and IBM
        • IBME
      • Price simulation
      • Token metrics and allocation
        • Token allocation
        • Token vesting
      • Governance
      • Node staking and rewards
        • Worker
        • Verifier
        • Manager
        • Penalty pool
      • Node sale and guaranteed node buyback
        • Node sales
        • Guaranteed Node Buyback
    • Future development
      • PoR and NFT minting for graphics creative assets
      • ZKP and PoR communication
      • Inferix RemotePC
      • Rendering professional network
    • References
    • Appendix A: Proofs
    • Appendix B: Price simulation details
    • Appendix C: Hardware requirements for nodes
    • Appendix D: Performance evaluation data
  • Worker Node Guide
    • What is Worker Node
      • How do the Worker Node work
      • Worker Node Rewards
      • How to run Worker Node
      • What is the Worker Node License (NFT)
    • Worker Node Sales
      • Guide to Purchase Worker Nodes
      • Worker Node Sale Timeline
      • Node Supply, Price, Tiers and Purchase Caps
      • Guaranteed Node Buyback
      • How to get Node Whitelisted?
      • Smart Contract Addresses
      • User Discounts & Referral Program
      • Worker Node Purchase FAQ
      • ABKK Collaboration FAQ
  • Verifier Node Guide
    • What is Verifier Node
      • How do the Verifier Node work
      • Verifier Node Rewards
      • How to run Verifier Node
      • What is the Verifier Node License (NFT)
    • Verifier Node Sales
      • Guide to Purchase Verifier Nodes
      • Verifier Node Sale Timeline
      • Node Supply, Price, Tiers and Purchase Caps
      • Guaranteed Node Buyback
      • How to get Node Whitelisted?
      • Smart Contract Addresses
      • User Discounts & Referral Program
      • Verifier Node Purchase FAQ
      • Aethir Node Winners FAQ
  • Inferix MVP
    • Tutorial: MVP for designers & GPU owners
    • PoR MVP
  • Inferix Testnet 2 on Solana & IoTeX [ENDED]
    • Adding GPUs to the Network
      • For GPU providers
      • For GPU providers without funds
      • For users without GPUs
      • For Inferix Node Holders
    • Renting GPU Devices
    • User Revenue Calculation
      • Worker Rewards
      • Rental Revenue
      • Viewing Revenue
      • Claiming Rewards
    • GPU Staking & Unstaking
      • Staking Requirements
      • Unstaking GPUs
    • Guide to get tIFX tokens
    • Why choose Inferix DePIN GPU Solutions?
  • Inferix Testnet 1 on IoTeX [ENDED]
    • Inferix GPU Solutions
    • Adding GPUs to the Network
    • Renting GPU Devices
    • User Revenue Calculation
    • GPU Staking
    • Multiple options to participate in the Staking & Mining Program
    • Special airdrop for Inferix Node Holders! 🎉
    • Guide to get tIFX tokens
    • FAQ
  • Inferix Explorer
  • Team & Achievements
    • Our Story
    • Team
    • Member of Cohort 1 DePINSurf
    • Achievements
  • Community & Events
    • Events
    • Inferix Campaign: "ALLIANCE" (ENDED)
  • Terms of Service
    • Privacy Policy
    • Airdrop Terms of Service
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Inferix Whitepaper
  2. Implementation of ANGV
  3. Noise insertion

Geometric constraints

PreviousNoise insertionNextDistortion region

Last updated 8 months ago

By the nature of physically based rendering , an object (or any part of it) in the scene will not be visible if and only if there is no visible light (or in general the light is out of the capability of the sensor) scattered from the surface of the object to the digital camera object. This may be caused by several reasons: the object is not located in the frustum of the camera, is hidden by other objects, or the object is made of some transparent material. Furthermore, the atomic signals wi (1≤i≤n)w_i \ \left(1 \leq i \leq n\right)wi​ (1≤i≤n) should not interfere themselves since this makes the noise verification to be unnecessarily complicated. Consequently, we require the noise embedding to satisfy first the following constraints:

  • there are no collisions between ωi (1≤i≤n)\omega_i \ \left(1 \leq i \leq n\right)ωi​ (1≤i≤n),

  • object vector Ω\OmegaΩ is completely located in the camera frustum,

  • no ωi\omega_iωi​ is hidden by another object (even partially), including both ωj∈Ω, j≠i\omega_j \in \Omega, \ j \neq iωj​∈Ω, j=i and objects of the scene.

As , the characteristics of atomic noises in frequency domain are crucial for the robustness of noise verification: we need to restore a certain amount of information about these characteristics from very small distortions made by the objects ωi∈Ω\omega_i \in \Omegaωi​∈Ω on rendered images. Because of the unavoidable requirement about the fidelity of images, we have to keep these distortions local, concretely these distortions must be well-placed on regions whose locations can be pre-calculated. A practical approach is to constrain the distortion made by ωi\omega_iωi​ to be of the same shape as the atomic noise wiw_iwi​. Geometrically, each ωi\omega_iωi​ has a rotation vector which characterizes the direction of the object in the global coordinate system (i.e. world space ) containing all objects of the scene GGG. To keep the rectangular shape of the distortion of ωi\omega_iωi​, we require that:

  • the rotation vector of ωi\omega_iωi​ is equal with the rotation vector of the digital camera of GGG for all ωi∈Ω\omega_i \in \Omegaωi​∈Ω.

previously mentioned
[1]
[1]